Pauline Hanson condemned and ejected from Senate after repeating burqa stunt
Josh Butler
The Senate has been suspended and Pauline Hanson has been ejected from the chamber after repeating her widely criticised 2017 stunt of wearing a burqa into the parliament.
Hanson wore the black face covering into the Senate chamber on Monday afternoon. It was seemingly a protest after having been denied leave to introduce a bill to ban the garment in Australia.
It kicked off instant outrage in the chamber, with opposing politicians calling out “old hat” and “been there, done that”. She had undertaken a similar stunt in 2017.
After Hanson refused to remove the face covering, the Senate resolved to ban Hanson from the parliament until she complied. After again refusing, the Senate was suspended temporarily. The chamber still sits suspended.
After the chamber was suspended, Hanson and her fellow One Nation senators were the last to leave. She yelled comments to supporters in the public gallery, claiming she’d been denied her right to introduce her bill.
Key events
Nationals on Hanson stunt: ‘most Australians will look away in disgust’
Nationals senator Matt Canavan has dismissed Pauline Hanson’s stunt as a disrespectful and debasement of parliament.
Here’s what he told the ABC a minute ago:
Pauline Hanson needs some new material because as you said she has recycled this from eight years ago.
While this might attract the interest of a small fringe in our society, I just dont think middle Australia like to see our parliament debased like this.
I think this is disrespectful to Muslim Australians as well, I don’t support you ridiculing people who have certain multicultural dress standards. It is not appropriate.
Doing this kind of stunt… it weakens her case, it cheapens our parliament and I think most Australians will look away in disgust.
Pauline Hanson condemned and ejected from Senate after repeating burqa stunt
Josh Butler
The Senate has been suspended and Pauline Hanson has been ejected from the chamber after repeating her widely criticised 2017 stunt of wearing a burqa into the parliament.
Hanson wore the black face covering into the Senate chamber on Monday afternoon. It was seemingly a protest after having been denied leave to introduce a bill to ban the garment in Australia.
It kicked off instant outrage in the chamber, with opposing politicians calling out “old hat” and “been there, done that”. She had undertaken a similar stunt in 2017.
After Hanson refused to remove the face covering, the Senate resolved to ban Hanson from the parliament until she complied. After again refusing, the Senate was suspended temporarily. The chamber still sits suspended.
After the chamber was suspended, Hanson and her fellow One Nation senators were the last to leave. She yelled comments to supporters in the public gallery, claiming she’d been denied her right to introduce her bill.
Bob Brown on Labor environmental law changes: ‘changing the deck chairs on the Titanic’
The co-founder of the Greens, Bob Brown, was just on the ABC criticising the government’s proposed EPBC reforms, which it expects will pass parliament at some stage this week.
Brown says changes proposed by Labor to secure the Greens support don’t go far enough:
They’re not much more than changing the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Look at logging. In Tasmania and New South Wales, the Albanese government could stop that tomorrow.
It’s the biggest cause of extinction of everything from koalas to greater gliders to critically endangered swift parrots and Tasmanian devils. But the industry is being financed and subsidised by Canberra as well as by state governments.
Search for missing four-year-old in South Australia to resume
South Australian police will resume a search for missing four-year-old Gus Lamont on Tuesday with a focus on six mine shafts close to where he was last seen.
A police spokesperson said officers would use specialist equipment to search the mine sharts that are located between 5.5km and 12km from the Oak Park homestead.
The mines have not been searched and were previously unknown to police.
The state’s deputy police commissioner, Linda Williams, said this part of the search could last for three days:
We are determined to explore every avenue in an effort to locate Gus Lamont and provide some closure for his family
These searches will either locate evidence or eliminate these locations from further investigation by the task force.’
The blond, curly haired Gus – described by a family member as shy but adventurous – went missing from his family’s outback sheep station more than two weeks ago.
At 5pm on Saturday 27 September, Gus’s grandmother last saw him playing on a mound of dirt at the homestead, which is near Yunta, about 300km from Adelaide.
Malaysia to introduce under-16s social media ban
Malaysia has announced it will follow the Australian government’s lead with plans to ban people younger than 16 from accessing social media.
The country’s communications minister, Fahmi Fadzil, said the government was reviewing mechanisms used to impose age restrictions for social media use in Australia, citing a need to protect youths from online harms such as cyberbullying, financial scams, and child sexual abuse:
We hope by next year that social media platforms will comply with the government’s decision to bar those under the age of 16 from opening user accounts.
Malaysia has put social media companies under greater scrutiny in recent years in response to what it claims to be a rise in harmful content, including online gambling and posts related to race, religion and royalty.
Platforms and messaging services with more than 8 million users in Malaysia are now required to obtain a license under a new regulation that came into effect in January.
Australia’s social media ban will begin on 10 December.
– with Reuters
Krishani Dhanji
Thank you all for following along on the blog with me today, I will see you here bright and early tomorrow!
I’ll leave you with the brilliant Henry Belot for the rest of the afternoon.
Tl;dr here’s what happened in question time
Greens say Labor’s proposed environmental law changes ‘welcome’ but ‘still not good enough to protect nature’
Dan Jervis-Bardy
The Greens say Labor’s nature laws are “still not good enough to protect the planet” and are demanding further changes in exchange for agreeing to pass them in parliament’s final sitting week of 2025.
The government has so far dangled two amendments in front of the Greens to woo the party to support the EPBC revamp: a promise to exclude coal and gas projects from a special “national exemption” exemption and a commitment to subject native forest logging to national environment standards within three years.
The Greens leader, Larissa Waters, said the proposed changes were “welcome” but not enough to win her backing.
Whilst we welcome those offers, the bill’s still not good enough to protect the planet. It’s still not good enough to protect nature, and it still fast tracks coal and gas.
The Greens environment spokesperson, Sarah Hanson-Young, said a three-year timeframe to apply new standards to native forest logging was “far too long”.
Three years to let the loggers get in there and trash our native forest is three years too long. I said that clearly to the government. I said it yesterday. I’ve repeated it again today. Three years is too long.
Hanson-Young dismissed environment minister Murray Watt’s insistence that the bill pass this week, noting that deadline was entirely self-imposed.
The Coalition is also refusing to support the legislation without major changes, leaving Labor without a clear path to get it through the Senate.
If we can’t get this bill fixed this week, and I’m going to do everything I can to help do that, but if the government won’t come to the party and fix it this week, then I put it to the minister, let’s work over summer. Let’s roll up our sleeves.
Question time ends
With a final dixer to the health minister, Mark Butler, the first question time for the week ends.
Labor does not confirm if government will respond to Murphy report recommending gambling ad ban
For something a little bit different now, the Greens MP Elizabeth Watson-Brown is asking a question to the chair of the standing committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs, which is Louise Miller-Frost, whether the committee will force the government to take action on the gambling report tabled by the late Labor MP Peta Murphy (who was the previous chair of this committee).
Milton Dick tells Watson-Brown that questions to a committee chair have to go to specific details, so she puts her question to the communications minister, Anika Wells:
It has now been almost 2 and a half years since the Murphy report recommended banning gambling advertising and in that time Australians have lost well over $60bn. Why are you putting the interests of Sportsbet ahead of the interests of Sportsbet ahead of the interests of ordinary Australians?
Wells says she has not met with any gambling companies but has “had meetings with harm reduction advocates, broadcasters and sporting codes as we seek to further minimise harms of gambling”.
She doesn’t say if or when the government will respond to the Murphy review.
