Your Party spokesperson says collective leadership model vote shows it is ‘doing politics differently’
A Your Party spokesperson said after the collective leadership option was narrowly approved by members voting online:
This vote shows that we really are doing politics differently: from the bottom-up, not the top-down.
In Westminster we have a professional political class increasingly disconnected from ordinary people, serving corporations and billionaires instead of the communities they are supposed to represent.
With a truly member-led party, we will offer something different: democratic, grassroots, accountable.
Collective leadership will see ordinary members (not MPs) elected to an executive committee.
Key events
The Guardian’s senior political correspondent, Peter Walker, has explored the reasons behind the factionalism and infighting plaguing Your Party in this piece:
Here are some of the key timings for the second day of Your Party’s inaugural conference in Liverpool:
Zarah Sultana expected to make a speech at about 2pm
Between 4.25pm and 4.40pm will see the result of the vote among members on four options for Your Party’s permanent name: our Party, Our Party, For the Many, or Popular Alliance.
Your Party spokesperson says collective leadership model vote shows it is ‘doing politics differently’
A Your Party spokesperson said after the collective leadership option was narrowly approved by members voting online:
This vote shows that we really are doing politics differently: from the bottom-up, not the top-down.
In Westminster we have a professional political class increasingly disconnected from ordinary people, serving corporations and billionaires instead of the communities they are supposed to represent.
With a truly member-led party, we will offer something different: democratic, grassroots, accountable.
Collective leadership will see ordinary members (not MPs) elected to an executive committee.
Zarah Sultana has welcomed the Your Party conference’s decision to choose a collective leadership model over a single leader option.
She said:
I have fought for maximum member democracy since day one. Seeing members choose collective leadership is truly exciting.
Together, we’re building a new socialist party – radically democratic and powered by a mass movement. This party will be led by its members, not MPs. This is only the beginning.
Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour party leader, had previously indicated he would favour a single leader model and would have been likely to stand for the position.
Your Party adopts ‘collective leadership’ structure
Ben Quinn
Ben Quinn is a senior reporter for the Guardian
The founding conference of the new left-wing party currently headed by Jeremy Corbyn and others has narrowly voted for it to have a ‘collective leadership’ in a win for Zarah Sultana, who has been at loggerheads with the former Labour leader.
The results were announced this morning after a chaotic start to the conference in Liverpool when Sultana, a former Labour MP who now sits as an independent, boycotted the first day amid disagreements over how Your Party – its provisional name – should be run.
Corbyn had said in advance of the results of voting on new constitutional arrangements that it was “quite hard for the public to grasp things that there are sort of ten people who run things.”
However, members voted by 51.6% to 48.6% for the party – whose future name will be announced later today following the counting of other voting – to have a collective leadership model. A new member-led executive will take the big decisions around the party’s management and strategy, with a chair, deputy chair and spokesperson helping to provide public leadership.
There were also wins for the other positions advocated by Sultana, including for members to be able to have dual membership of other political group.
The latter vote is significant against the backdrop of in-fighting which saw Sultana refusing to enter the conference hall on Saturday in solidarity with delegates who were expelled over links to other leftwing parties, which she described as a “witch-hunt”.
Members of other parties will be eligible to join only after their party has been ratified by the party’s new executive (CEC) and Conference as being aligned with the party’s values.
Corbyn had told journalists on Saturday that entry to Your Party was granted on the condition members were not aligned with other parties registered with the Electoral Commission. The party last week revealed a shortlist of names for its members to pick from and which will be announced later today: Your Party, Our Party, Popular Alliance and For The Many.
Budget 2025: key points at a glance
My colleagues Rob Davies and Rowena Mason have done a useful explainer looking at the main points of the budget, which you can read here:
Badenoch says Reeves should resign as Labour is accused of breaking manifesto pledge
Kemi Badenoch has reiterated her calls for the chancellor to resign on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, after accusing Rachel Reeves of breaking promises not to raise taxes.
In this year’s budget, Reeves froze tax thresholds for three years longer than previously planned, meaning that as wages rise more people will have to start paying income tax.
Labour promised in its 2024 general election manifesto that it would “not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase national insurance, the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, or VAT”.
Badenoch told the BBC this morning:
The chancellor called an emergency press conference telling everyone about how terrible the state of the finances were and now we have seen that the OBR had told her the complete opposite. She was raising taxes to pay for welfare.
The only thing that was unfunded was the welfare payments which she has made and she’s doing it on the backs of a lot of people out there who are working very hard and getting poorer. And because of that, I believe she should resign.
Badenoch added:
The shadow chancellor, Mel Stride, has written to the FCA (the Financial Conduct Authority). Hopefully there will be an investigation, because it looks like what she was doing was trying to pitch-roll her budget – tell everyone how awful it would be and then they wouldn’t be as upset when she finally announced it – and still sneak in those tax rises to pay for welfare. That’s not how we should be running this process.
Badenoch says the government has delivered a ‘budget for benefits’
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has been interviewed by Trevor Phillips on Sky News. She said that Reeves’ budget has made the nation poorer and that she “should be resigning” having done a “terrible” job.
Badenoch said:
Every single thing that Rachel Reeves did in that budget makes all of us poorer. There are a lot of people out there who are struggling. Go and look at the farmers, for instance – we’re taxing farmers, many of whom are getting less than the minimum wage, to pay for benefits.
We are taxing everybody now to pay for benefits. This was a budget for benefits. That is not the chancellor’s job. That is not what she’s supposed to be doing. Benefits are supposed to be a safety net, they’re not supposed to make you middle-class.
We are at a point now where the rider is getting heavier than the horse, we cannot afford this, and we are leaving debts for our children. That is not fair.
Badenoch is calling for a reduction in the welfare bill, including around mental health benefits.
Reeves says that growth is the government’s top priority
Laura Kuenssberg said it is no longer “credible” for the chancellor to say her number one priority is growth as the budget has made it more expensive for businesses to hire people and pushed up some business rates.
The OBR forecasts the economy will expand by 1.5% this year, higher than the previous estimate of 1%.
However, it lowered its growth estimates to 1.4% next year and 1.5% in the following four years.
Reeves insists that growth is the top priority for the government, pointing to recent investments in the UK by firms including JP Morgan in London and Goldman Sachs in Birmingham as positive signs.
She told the BBC:
(The OBR) has assessed productivity over the last 14 years as having been lower than they previously expected. Now, I don’t think that the Conservative legacy should define Britain’s future. But I have got to show we can beat those forecasts. We’ve beaten them this year … I am determined to beat those forecasts in the future.
Reeves says freezing tax thresholds was “the right thing” to do to safeguard spending commitments, and investment in the NHS.
I don’t accept that I misled the public, Reeves says
Reeves is being interviewed by the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg. Rachel Reeves was told the Treasury “very deliberately” created the impression she had to put people’s taxes up to fill a “big gap in the public finances that simply didn’t exist”.
Asked if she misled the public in the run up to the budget by Kuenssberg, Reeves said:
I do not accept that at all. The OBR numbers themselves, which I agree with and we knew they were going to be published, they are very clear that there was less fiscal space than there was just a few months ago in the spring. And we needed not less but more fiscal headroom …
Kuenssberg interrupts to say the chancellor didn’t need an extra £26bn in extra taxes to fill the fiscal black hole.
Reeves added:
The numbers that you are using show that the headroom, the fiscal space, had deteriorated. That’s exactly what those numbers show … And of course, that didn’t include the policy choices that we had made between the spring and the autumn including on welfare and including on the winter fuel allowance …
I said when those policies changed just before the summer that we would have to find the money in the budget so I was very upfront about that.
Reeves was also asked about her decision to scrap the two child benefit cap from next April, which is estimated to cost £3bn a year by 2029-30.
The move, which came amid intense pressure from Labour backbenchers, was welcomed by campaigners and charities who argue it is the most cost-effective way to cut child poverty.
The two-child limit prevents parents from claiming child tax credit or universal credit for more than two children.
Asked whether the decision to remove the cap was in response to pressure from Labour MPs, Rachel Reeves told Trevor Phillips:
We’re choosing children. This lifts more than half a million children out of poverty, combined with our changes on free breakfast clubs, extending free school meals, 30 hours free childcare for working parents and preschool-age children …
The people I was thinking about were kids who I know in my constituency go to school hungry and go to bed in cold and damp homes, and from April next year those parents will have a bit more support to help their kids.
Reeves appears to back OBR chief despite watchdog’s shock leak
Rachel Reeves’s much-anticipated budget was undermined after the Office for Budget Responsibility’s economic forecast appeared online about 40 minutes before she announced her policies to the Commons.
The chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility, Richard Hughes, has said he will continue to lead the watchdog unless he loses the confidence of the chancellor, the Treasury committee or parliament.
The OBR’s investigation into the leak is expected to report to the chancellor on Monday.
Asked if Hughes’ position is safe, Reeves said she will study the contents of the report tomorrow, but that she has a “huge amount of respect” for him and the budget watchdog.
She told Sky News:
We will get a report tomorrow, the report that looks at what happened about that budget leak. It was clearly serious. It was clearly a serious breach of the protocol, but I’ll see that report tomorrow.
‘Of course I didn’t’ lie about budget forecasts, Reeves said
Rachel Reeves said she “of course” had not lied about the state of the public finances before the budget. “Of course I didn’t,” she told Trevor Phillips.
Earlier, the chancellor had told his programme:
In the context of a downgrade in our productivity, which cost £16bn, I needed to increase taxes, and I was honest and frank about that in the speech that I gave at beginning of November.
Keir Starmer said on Thursday that Reeves’s £26bn tax-raising budget had “kept to our manifesto”, but conceded that Labour had “asked everybody to contribute” in the years ahead.
Rachel Reeves is speaking to Trevor Phillips on Sky News. He started by replaying a clip of the chancellor saying last year that Labour would not increase taxes further in a future budget. He says her statements turned out not to be true.
Reeves defended this year’s budget by saying it “was not on the scale of the one last year”, adding that she had to ask people to “contribute more” because the “context” had changed.
Reeves said the OBR decided to do a review of productivity and said the watchdog’s productivity downgrade did not reflect anything the Labour government had done.
Chancellor to defend budget amid deepening row over deficit claims
Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of UK politics. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has become engulfed in a politically damaging row about what she told the public about the state of the British economy ahead of last week’s budget.
Reeves had claimed that a downgrade to the UK’s predicted economic productivity would make it more difficult to meet her self-imposed fiscal rules.
She used a speech on 4 November to suggest tax rises were needed because poor productivity growth would have “consequences for the public finances”. It was seen by many as an attempt to clear the way for breaching Labour’s manifesto letter of the pledge on income tax by raising rates.
But the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) – the budget watchdog – on Friday said it had informed the chancellor as early as 17 September that an improved tax take from growing wages and inflation meant the shortfall was likely smaller than initially expected, and told her in October it had been eliminated altogether.
The OBR’s disclosure has prompted opposition figures to urge the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to investigate whether the Treasury deceived the public. The Conservatives have accused Reeves of “market abuse”, which is a civil offence. No 10 has denied Reeves misled the public over the state of the country’s finances ahead of the budget.
The prime minister, Keir Starmer, is expected to give his backing to the budget in a speech tomorrow, saying it will help ease cost of living pressures and lower inflation, and will reportedly announce plans to go “further and faster” to encourage growth.
Reeves will be questioned about the row this morning on the broadcast rounds so stick with us for the latest developments.
